|
|
At an internet cafe in the middle of the Old City - quite a contrast of modernity in this ancient city. I arrived back in Jerusalem Sunday morning, getting a ride from Bethlehem with the MCC couple living there, and joined them for the english service at a lutheran church in the old city. Afterwards, I was invited to join them, MCC Jordan rep. Alan, and MCC overseers from Winnepeg, Rick and Jan Janzen, to eat kanafe (special dessert that has a white mozzerela-ish cheese on the bottom and sweet syrupy crust on top). It was fun to have that interaction with very likable and admirable people. And i like kanafe.
Sunday evening our group reconvened after our week of free travel at Ecce Homo, a convent within the old city walls, where we are staying for this week. Began the daunting task of trying to catch up after a week of being apart and having different experiences. The idea of trying to catch up after a whole semester seems pretty much impossible. But I suppose we'll have to try
The convent is just a few blocks from the temple mount - the golden dome of the dome of the rock is a very significant portion of our view from the roof/deck/porches. This week our focus is on learning about Judaism and Jewish culture. It is a struggle for me to try to understand secular and traditional Judaism, which are the dominant forms of Judaism in Israel - 80% of Israeli Jews are secular. Yet many secular Jews (who would consider themselves atheist/humanist) keep a kosher house, fast on the day of atonement, and the state collectively makes extensive use of biblical images in their humanist nationalism. Our speaker this morning, himself an observant religious Jew, illuminated some of these parallels between the role of Judaism as a civil religion by taking us to two sacred Jewish 'mountains': First we visited Mount Moriah (the temple mount), where king David first brought the ark of the covenant to strengthen the spiritual centrality of Jerusalem for his kingdom, and then we went to Mount Herzl (in the New City of Jerusalem), where another David - David Ben Gurion - brought another sacred box, the remains of Herzl (the founder of secular zionism whose vision essentially created the modern state of Israel), also as a deliberate government move to enhance the spiritual centrality of Jerusalem. I'm really not comfortable with civil religion - with religion being used to support political objectives. it feels so tainted and ungenuine to me. Yet this observant Jew felt very positively about the secular use of biblical images, glad that they at least keep practicing the culture, if not the faith. Learning to more fully understand this dual Jewish identity that has somewhat distinct ethnic and religious components will be an ongoing process for these next several weeks.
On a more positive note, the speakers (most of them Jewish and of a variety of backgrounds and perspectives) have been very interesting and have been some really wonderful people. It is very nice to have these interactions to help us have human faces for Israelis, that are distinctly different from the Israeli soldiers we encountered in the West Bank who were actively or indirectly acting in ways that dehumanized the Palestinians. I am grateful for the new dimensions of complexity this week has given us. Friday evening (shabbat - sabbath - begins at sundown) we will go to a synagoge service and then have shabbat meal in the homes of Jewish families. Really looking forward to that. Monday we move on to our next home - kibbutz afikim in the Galilee, which will introduce us to another aspect of Israeli society. Keep us in your thoughts and prayers!
| | |
| I wrote a post - two, actually -- but not on here.
If you want to read, go here:
http://www.mcc.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=219
and here:
http://www.mcc.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=214
and feel free to leave comments here or there 
| | |
| In response to comments on the previous entry:
i completely agree that one-issue voting is not a good idea, including voting soley based on environmental positions.
I also agree that our main goal should be to promote and live out the
kingdom of God on earth. And I'm assuming (correct me if i'm
wrong) that you would agree that our Christianity should have relevance
to our lives now, and apply to how we choose to live our lives.
So yes, promoting the kingdom should be our goal rather than endless
political debates, but because our faith is supposed to be relevant to
every aspect of our existence, then it's going to relate to, and shape
how we view these issues that we've been discussing, and determine how
we respond (and ignoring or avoiding the issues is just as much of a
response as screaming at people who disagree with you).
I tend to go to possibly excessive lengths to avoid being put in a box,
but i'm going to go out on a limb and make a few definitive statements
about my positions:
I oppose abortion. I think its horrible. I think it is
killing innocent life. I think that it is mistakenly seen as a
solution to a huge problem in someone's life, and our culture promotes
abortion as an easy way out of either bad judgement, carelessness, or a
horrible tragedy. I do not think having an abortion is ever the
best solution for dealing with an unwanted pregnancy.
Several decades ago there was a supreme court ruling that legalized
abortion. That decision was made by the top dogs of the judicial
department, and basically, unless they change their minds, that
decision stands. The president, whom we the people (sort of)
elect to office, does not have authority over the justice
department. The president is not in a position to change the
legality of abortion. That is simply not something that he is
able to change. Therefore I feel that abortion is in particular
not a good choice for being a 'one-issue voter', (though I know that is
the big issue for many Christians when choosing who to vote for).
I don't want to talk about the election more, though there are a lot of
things i feel like i should clarify.
In response to the comment: "I think abortion cannot be compared with
the environmental 'problems' we may have" ('may' in italics),
I understand that to imply a disbelief that there are real, serious
environmental problems in the present. Yes, there are extremists
who overstate the problems, but there are also anti-abortion activists
who murder doctors that perform abortions. I agree with the
concerns of both, but do not wish to be associated with or judged by
the actions of either.
There are currently numerous environmental problems that are real,
serious, and costing innocent lives. You have the freedom to deny
this, but you cannot do so with a valid factual basis. If anyone
disagrees, I would be happy to send you daily news updates that should
be eye-opening. Just let me know :)
| | |
| In response to posting by filups (you'll want to read that first for this to make sense):
Why do people have to be so incredibly shortsighted and selfish?
So often it's not even an issue of 'the health of the economy' versus
'a few plants and bugs that no one really cares about' - This is making
it possible for a powerful timber company to push their wishes for
greater profit over the best interest of all the 'normal' people who
will suffer the loss and will suffer real economic and health
consequences that ultimately result from shortsighted policy that
ignores ecological impact.
I realize this might be somewhat offensive to people, but please just
consider it fully before recoiling in horror and then shoving me in a
box (if you haven't done that already (: ):
It especially bothers me that it is often
people who are very vocal about being Christians who are also the ones
who show complete contempt for environmental protection and seem almost
solely concerned about economic profit. Doesn't it seem like God
is probably more concerned about the wellbeing of creation (including
all the people who are impacted by the health of their region) than he
is about a few rich people increasing their margin of profit? I
don't see how a life of discipleship can reconcile also holding such
contempt for God's creation (in preference for material gain).
It's true that environmental protectionism can
be taken way over board by some extremists who see any economic
activity as an evil to be fought to the death. But. That is
not the general case. In the long term, economic and
environmental interests are not mutually exclusive, as they are usually
assumed to be, but what is best for the economy in the long run is very
much dependent on long term ecological base being preserved. It
is only greedy, selfish, shortsighted economic policies that are in
direct conflict with environmental preservation and sustainability
| | |
| Super cool book (though I'm only partway through chapter 2 (Its also slightly slow reading, but entirely worth the effort))
I've been feeling in the past month or so that the ideas i've heard from peole who align themselves with both the left and right theologically don't quite create a full picture that I can completely buy into. It seems that there are concepts from both that are important and represent Truth, but something is lacking. This guy does an amazing job of articulating the central views of both the 'left' and 'right' and making the connection between these core beliefs (from both ends of the spectrum) and why these understandings of Christianity are causing the decline of the Church and morality. I'm doing a horrible job of summarizing his book, so I'll just give an excerpt, and if that's not clear, then you'll just have to read the book yourself (which you should do anyway) 
"When we examine the broad spectrum of Christian proclamation and practice, we see that the only thing made essential on the right wing of theology is forgiveness of the individual's sins. On the left it is the removal of social or structural evils. The curent gospel then be omes a "gospel of sin management." Transformation of life and character is no part of the redemptive message. Moment-to-moment human reality in its depths is not the arena of faith and eternal living."
"To the right, being a Christian is a matter of having your sins forgiven. To the left, you are christian if you have a significant commitment to the elimination of social evils. A Christian is either one who is ready to die and face the judgment of God or one who has an identifiable commitment to love and justice in society. That's it. " (p. 41) | | |
|